John Dewey: Theories and Concepts how People Believe
In 1933 John Dewey (1933) presented his hypotheses and concepts on how people think. This individual identified several different modes of thought including reflection. He saw expression as a piece of believed, a rational and purposeful act that is certainly more after that mere thinking. Dewey in comparison routine actions with reflective action, sitting the roots of reflective practice in teaching (Zwozdiak-Myers, 2012, l. 5). In his notion of reflective actions he described a motivation to engage in self-assessment, which required versatility, analysis and social recognition (Pollard, 2006, p. 13). His representation described a willingness to consider several possibilities and the ability and desire to understand various views (Zwozdiak-Myers, 2012, p. 5). Reflection, being a familiar activity, is often misitreperted, overlooked in the formal process of teaching and equated with similar actions such as thinking about the day, producing sense of experiences there were or discussing resent took place events and issues. During these daily activities professors assume that learning occurs (Boud, Keogh, & Walker, 85, p. 8). Employing a reflective teaching procedure, a teacher will be in charge of the educating process and its particular outcome, giving the tutor the ability to research on the effectiveness of his teaching allowing him to asses if perhaps learning certainly occurs (Killen, 1989, p. 52). With this assignment I will first, describe reflection. Through this explanation Let me consider the various classification, groups and some features of representation. Next Let me argue that reflection within the learning process is important for the teacher. Let me thereafter seriously discuss some of the advantages and limitations of gaining reviews from learners in the refractive practice and may conclude the advantages surpass the limitations of gaining opinions. For a teacher to employ a reflective practice he or she has to firstly understand the meaning of reflection. Rodgers (2002) features the judgment that, after almost a hundred years of taking into consideration reflection there is absolutely no clear understanding in our educational literature of what exactly reflection is. The lady reconsiders Dewey's concept of reflection and formulated four conditions that the girl felt characterized his notion of reflection. The girl speaks of reflection like a " meaning making process that moves a learner from experience in to the nextвЂќ, as a " methodical, rigorous, self-disciplined way of thinkingвЂќ that " needs to happen in community, in conversation with othersвЂќ and it needs " attitude that benefit the personal and intellectual growth of oneself associated with othersвЂќ (Rodgers, 2002, l. 845). Reflection starts each time a person questions into their experiences and knowledge relevant to the experience, permitting him or her to ascribe meaning to his / her beliefs (Collier, 1999, g. 173). Learning is afflicted through a process of thinking and reflecting upon new experiences in relation to an existing knowledge foundation and very own understanding. Collier (1999) refers to Kitchener's research that implies a continuation of the expression process, wherever knowledge will be viewed as certain and absolute, learned by authorities and direct observations. This complete acceptance of knowledge develops, since the person's own activities and understanding develops to " doubtful, relative and personal constructedвЂќ (1999, p. 174). SchГ¶n (1987) is of the opinion that reflection builds up in a hierarchical manner, that drives the usage of theory inside practice, plus the use of this sort of a process finally leads to expertise. He determined two possible processes of reflection, a retrospective analysis of encounters, the reflection-on-action and the reflection-in-action, which is the reflection while an active section of the experience. In the reflection-on-action a teacher is going to reflect after a lesson for the process simply by thinking about the lessons, reflecting on the good and bad moments in the address, considering how to improve on the bad elements...
Sources: Boud, M., Keogh, R., & Master, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience in Learning. (D. Boud, Ur. Keogh, & D. Walker, Eds. ) London: Kogan Page Ltd.
Brookfield, T. (1995). Becoming a Critically Refractive teacher. S . fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Collier, S. (1999). Characteristics of Reflective Thought During the Student Teaching Knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 50 (3), 173-180.
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. Boston: M. C. Heath & Company.
Howells, T. (2014, 02 27). Week two: Refelection (Powerpoint Slide). Retrieved goal 20, 2014, from Utas, Mylo: https://mylo.utas.edu.au
Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in refelction: core reflection as a method to enhance specialist growth. Instructors and Instructing: theory and practice, 10 (1), 47-71.
Pollard, A. (2005). Reflecting Teaching (2nd ed. ). London: Entier.
Rodgers, C. (2002). Determining Reflection: One more Look at John Dewey and Reflective Thinking. Teachers College Record, 842-866.
Schon, D. (1987). Teaching the Reflecting practitioner. Towards a new style for teaching and learning in the careers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Zwozdiak-Myers, P. (2012). The Teacher is actually Reflective Practice Handbook. Greater london: Routledge.